Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Of disbarred, dishonest and other lawyers at Permatang Pasir

More updates: Shamsul Yunus has a posting in response to the Bar Council's:
Hot News: Bernama confirms my version
Pisau.net has documents which it said are proof that Rohaizat tidak bersalah
updated: More heat on BN candidate in Permatang Pasir. The statement by the Bar Council secretary, which appeared here, has certainly put Muhyiddin and company in a bit of a spot.

Press Release: Clarification regarding Rohaizat Othman PDF Print E-mail
Contributed by George Varughese
Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:34pm
ImageIn response to inquiries from the media, we wish to clarify Rohaizat Othman's status as an advocate and solicitor.

The Advocates and Solicitors Disciplinary Board struck Rohaizat Othman off the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors on 7 March 2008 after he was found guilty of misconduct. The Disciplinary Board's decision arose from an investigation into the complaint lodged against Rohaizat Othman by the purchaser of a piece of real property. According to the complaint, Rohaizat Othman failed to refund almost RM 161,000 to the complainant after the transaction was aborted.

Rohaizat Othman appealed against the decision of the Disciplinary Board to the High Court, and the appeal was dismissed on 12 August 2009. He is therefore legally disqualified from practising as an advocate and solicitor.

The finding of misconduct is personal to Rohaizat Othman, as the Disciplinary Board would not hold a lawyer liable for the actions of his/her law partner(s).


George Varughese
Secretary
Malaysian Bar

Original Post:
Straits Times of Singapore has the story of BN candidate for Permatang Pasir being disbarred by the Bar Council last year. Such a story, of course, is hot hot hot.

Shamsul Yunus the My Anger blogger has put up a quick posting here to point out that the complaints against Rohaizat Othman, he 38-year old BN man, were WITHDRAWN in March 2008. Shamsul also slams lawyer Haris Ibrahim for what he alleges to be the lawyer's "half-truth" campaign lawyer Rohaizat.

Shamsul, who will be contributing articles daily from Permatang Pasir for The Malay Mail, was trained to be a lawyer, by the way.


120 comments:

  1. "Bar Council president Ragunath Kesavan told The Edge Malaysia that the proceedings under Section 103D of the Legal Profession Act 1976 involved misconduct of the individual lawyer.

    "The offence was for personal liability and does not involve any other persons as Rohaizat was named by the complainant, and not his partner". The Edge

    Bro, this is quite different from what SY says that it was Rohaizat's partner who was responsible for CBT. The matter also went to the High Court which dismissed Rohaizat's appeal against disbarrment on 7th March 2008.

    In any event, did DPM and Zahid read the dossier fully or just skim over it before nominating Rohaizat for P.Pasir?

    Surely UMNO is not so bereft of candidates of integrity and stature that it has to plunk for a controversial choice, giving PAS and Pakatan a field day to take potshots at him, the DPM, Zahid and UMNO/BN all together? In the P.Pauh by-election in 2008, the UMNO candidate falsely claimed he has a PhD. Lol.

    Who writes their script, I wonder.

    dpp
    We are all of 1 race, the Human Race

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:59 pm

    simple...produce the evidence and clear his name. Until then, its hearsay.

    ReplyDelete
  3. spin, jangan tak spin; mesti kerja baru dapat upah.

    Below is the official statement issued by the Bar Council:

    In response to inquiries from the media, we wish to clarify Rohaizat Othman's status as an advocate and solicitor.

    The Advocates and Solicitors Disciplinary Board struck Rohaizat Othman off the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors on 7 March 2008 after he was found guilty of misconduct. The Disciplinary Board's decision arose from an investigation into the complaint lodged against Rohaizat Othman by the purchaser of a piece of real property. According to the complaint, Rohaizat Othman failed to refund almost RM 161,000 to the complainant after the transaction was aborted.

    Rohaizat Othman appealed against the decision of the Disciplinary Board to the High Court, and the appeal was dismissed on 12 August 2009. He is therefore legally disqualified from practising as an advocate and solicitor.

    The finding of misconduct is personal to Rohaizat Othman, as the Disciplinary Board would not hold a lawyer liable for the actions of his/her law partner(s).


    George Varughese
    Secretary
    Malaysian Bar

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bar Council says its personal misconduct courtesy of The Edge.

    Says High Court dismissed his appeal on Aug 12.

    Character assasination?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous2:25 pm

    http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/press_statements/press_release_clarification_regarding_rohaizat_othman.html

    Please clarify bro rocky.

    Regards,
    Gary.

    ReplyDelete
  6. LLB - Lagi Lagi Bengap2:31 pm

    He isn't the only one in office lar...hmph!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bro,

    More from the Br Council tday:

    "The Bar Council today confirmed Rohaizat Othman was disbarred due to personal misconduct.

    KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 18 — The Bar Council has confirmed that Barisan Nasional’s (BN) candidate for the Permatang Pasir by-election, Rohaizat Othman, was found guilty of misconduct last year and struck off the rolls.

    In a statement today, Bar Council secretary George Varughese said the Advocates and Solicitors Displinary Board disbarred Rohaizat on March 7, 2008.

    The Disciplinary Board’s decision arose from an investigation into the complaint lodged against Rohaizat Othman by the purchaser of a piece of real property.

    According to the complaint, Rohaizat Othman failed to refund almost RM 161,000 to the complainant after the transaction was aborted, said Varughese.

    He said Rohaizat had also appealed to the High Court against the decision of the disciplinary board. The appeal was dismissed by the High Court last Wednesday.

    Varughese added that the finding of misconduct was personal to Rohaizat as the disciplinary board would not hold a lawyer liable for the actions of his partners.

    The Bar Council’s statement suggests that BN leaders may have been misinformed about his status.

    Penang Umno chief Datuk Zahid Hamidi had claimed yesterday that it was Rohaizat’s partner who had taken off with the client’s money.

    Deputy Umno president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin also accused the opposition of character assassination and claimed Rohaizat was not legally wrong.

    But the Bar Council has now made it clear that Rohaizat was personally found guilty of misconduct." MI 18/08/09

    pp
    We are all of 1 race, the Human Race

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous2:47 pm

    Statement from Bar Council fyi.

    Press Release: Clarification regarding Rohaizat Othman
    Contributed by George Varughese
    Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:34pm
    In response to inquiries from the media, we wish to clarify Rohaizat Othman's status as an advocate and solicitor.

    The Advocates and Solicitors Disciplinary Board struck Rohaizat Othman off the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors on 7 March 2008 after he was found guilty of misconduct. The Disciplinary Board's decision arose from an investigation into the complaint lodged against Rohaizat Othman by the purchaser of a piece of real property. According to the complaint, Rohaizat Othman failed to refund almost RM 161,000 to the complainant after the transaction was aborted.


    Rohaizat Othman appealed against the decision of the Disciplinary Board to the High Court, and the appeal was dismissed on 12 August 2009. He is therefore legally disqualified from practising as an advocate and solicitor.

    The finding of misconduct is personal to Rohaizat Othman, as the Disciplinary Board would not hold a lawyer liable for the actions of his/her law partner(s).


    George Varughese
    Secretary
    Malaysian Bar

    18 August 2009

    ReplyDelete
  9. funny thing bout what’s is going on with this BN candidate.the umno fellas rocky bru and shamsul yunus tryin to paint as if the umno calun fella has been a victim of injustice of the very own system he practise.kununnya the case has been withdrawn and in appeal stage since last year.i am not a law graduate, and hence can only comment from my own point of view.It is strange how well educated guys ( i assume) like rocky bru and shamsul would succumb so low to protect the man who could as well be the scum of the earth.I say this coz first the guy already been disbarred, and secondly for god sake, takin money from pekebun getah yg kais pagi makan pagi…come onla rocky …wise up…i salute haris for this exposure…
    JG

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous3:01 pm

    rocky,

    perhaps you can clarify on the excerpt below:

    The Sun today reported:

    When contacted, Bar Council chairman Ragunath Kesavan said all offences under the Legal Profession Act, under which Rohaizat was guilty, hold personal liability.

    Stressing that the charge as tantamount to criminal misconduct, he said Rohaizat, not his partner, was named by the complainant over a sum of about RM140,000.

    “If you are an innocent party, you would not be found guilty by the (Bar Council’s) disciplinary board. Rohaizat’s appeal against the Bar Council decision was dismissed by the High Court on Aug 12,” said Ragunath.

    If the appeal has already been dismissed, he stands guilty, no?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bro rocky,

    If i were u, I would sack that Sham[e]S[o]ul or yours.

    He spins wrong way bebeh..

    Jerat Makan Tuan..

    ps: Sham[e]S[o]ul, i guess u didn't read much compare to Haris..

    Suck Big Time U[m]N000000

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous3:16 pm

    APA KISAH DIA DISBARRED KE APA KE...

    CALON PAS KAT MANEK URAI JUAL IKAN AJE KAT PASAR..

    APA YG KORANG NAK KECOH?

    PENGUNDI PERMATANG PASIR INGAT KISAH SGT KE DIA TU KENA DISBARRED?

    YANG PENTING, BOLEH BUAT KEJE.. BUKANNYA CUMA PANDAI BUAT RUSUHAN AJER.

    samdol kampung nangka laut (dalam permatang pasir).

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous3:25 pm

    I am not sure who is right and who is wrong but

    is umno so desperate for a good candidate?

    can't they find a person who is not controversial?

    a simple,low profile and humble school teacher for example!

    zahid or muhyddin should be sacked for this mess!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous3:30 pm

    Dear Bru,

    What's the problem? Your friend Anwar Ibrahim was convicted of - 1/ Sodomy and 2/ Abuse of Power 10 years ago. He was released by the Sleepy Prime Minister but cannot stand for election last year in March becos the ban on him contesting ran till April. (Anwar did not run in the March elections because his abuse of power conviction barred him from holding political office for five years. The ban ended in April).

    So there you are! What's the problem? Sodomiser and Power Abuser can still stand for election and almost became our Prime Minister last September, right?

    Anti-Puksman

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous3:30 pm

    Yes, Just produce evidences to clear his name. It is unlikely the comments from the Bar Council is not accurate.Right is right and wrong is wrong. It does not matter is you are from BN or PR. If the candidate is morally wrong, than just withdraw and concede defeat and don't waste tax payers money.
    Ex-BN Supporter.

    ReplyDelete
  16. to
    Anonymous 3:16pm aka samdol kampung nangka laut (dalam permatang pasir).

    Apa la punya lembab OTAK awak ni..
    Ko PAHAM or tidak kenapa dia kena "DISBARRED" tu..

    MAKSUDnya, dia tu PECAH AMANAH curi/gelap/bawa lari/cilok/dll duit Koperasi org-org kpg sana..

    Macam UMNO la, berapa ramai ahli dan menteri dan pembesar yg sama PERANGAI mcm si Aizat tu, PENIPU dan PERASUAH serta PENCURI hak-hak asasi rakyat Malaysia..

    Kesian Melayu...
    En. Anon:316pm, apa kata awak pegi nasihat si SHAMSUL BADIGOL tu buat laporan yg BENAR dan IKHLAS kalau nak org baca Malay Mail..

    Pemerhati Bebas Selalu

    ReplyDelete
  17. oppsie-daisy ---- so malu! rocky better just close this blog and quit as an editor!

    LOL!!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Mazlan3:40 pm

    Obviously someone screwed up in the whole vetting process.......
    But this is a problem when warlords rule which candidate gets picked - their criteria is who is able to pay the most. He's also a top gun in UMNO Youth so no one was going to worry too much on the vetting side.

    However I will give UMNO some lee way on this as this a problem that Pakatan needs to sort out as well.
    There are too many candidates, ADUNs, MPs and so on who have not been carefully vetted and are real sub-quality.
    Perak was bought down by 3 real sub-quality PR candidates who had no conviction to the cause.

    Thus lesson to be learnt by all parties: "Pick candidates with integrity and commitment to public service" or you will end up in a mess.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous3:56 pm

    sdr samdol,

    sekurang2nya mamat manek urai tu taklah pecah amanah masa die juai ikan..

    apakah UMNO tak de calon lain selain yg pandai pecah amanah/korup/samseng??

    ReplyDelete
  20. Bro, Maybe best if Penasihat Undang-undang UMNO, Hafarizam Harun explains the matter.

    The Bar Council statement as opposed to Bro Shamsul's detailed posting needed to be explained by UMNO who choose Rohaizat as their candidate. Should be done today, the campaigning period is very short. Pakatan will go into town with the Bar's press statement today.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Maybe UMNO will get some juniour Judicial commisioner next week and announce that he is not disbarred, postponed till after pilihanraya.

    i guess the internal politic of UMNO is really strong.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous4:00 pm

    tell your blogger writer to do his homework rocky and you too

    ReplyDelete
  23. HEHEHE4:05 pm

    Antipuksman,

    correct, correect, correct!

    Not only that meh. Fuckatan supporters also don't mind their MP and Adun who are underworld lords and who use state funds to maintain their lexus.

    HEHEHE

    ReplyDelete
  24. The Manek Urai candidate might be a Jual Ikan but people can trust him with their money... can people of P Pasir trust this disbarred lawyer with their money?

    Secondly, your source might be a trained lawyer Rocky, but it has been proven the folks at RTM and Utusan doesn't know which party Karpal Singh belongs to or who is Anwar Ibrahim.

    Aiyoh Rocky, this is embarassment big time lah brother...

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous4:32 pm

    macam ni la cara islam PAS berkempen. Lagipun islam PAS ni boleh masyuk syurga and since PAS for all, BAR COUNCIL are now granted access to heaven. courtesy of the TUAN GURU nik aziz, god of the land and the sea and the almighty.

    ReplyDelete
  26. "The finding of misconduct is personal to Rohaizat Othman, as the Disciplinary Board would not hold a lawyer liable for the actions of his/her law partner(s)."

    This sentence explains all.....

    ReplyDelete
  27. Bro, on the other hand SPR has accepted Rohaizat's nomination so he is a legitimate candidate.

    The issue is not such a big deal, if People like Haris Ibrahim and his Pakatan Rakus Cohort wants to make an issue,then they need not go too far to know their own leaders:

    -Anwar Ibrahim who is an ex-convict, sentenced for abuse of power also got re-elected as Permatang Pauh MP.

    -Lim Guan Eng is also an ex-convict, sentenced for sedition, he won in Penang and was duly appointed as Menteri Besar.

    So UMNO just have to work extra hard to defend their man at Permatang Pasir.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous5:06 pm

    woi Pemerhati!

    BACA LAH NI WEH!

    http://pusakaayahnda.blogspot.com/2009/08/n11-dokumen-penarikan-balik-dakwaan.html


    samdol

    ReplyDelete
  29. enough!!!! ...umno is fucked...i'd rather cut off my dick than vote for this loyar buruk dickhead...

    ReplyDelete
  30. bro rocky ,,

    check this out

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_jLPyrrG8cRw/SonBXKlwWlI/AAAAAAAAAmc/28rdtK38s8I/s1600/STATUS%2BROHAIZAT%2B6.jpg

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jLPyrrG8cRw/SonA-qmHkmI/AAAAAAAAAmU/-6Fxk2vwiAY/s1600/STATUS%2BROHAIZAT%2B7.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  31. The reply

    http://www.pisau.net/2009/08/n11-permatang-pasir-dokumen-membuktikan.html

    We provide documents not just lip service...

    Do give BN the right of reply rocky, thank you.

    And don't we all love the BAR council.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anonymous5:47 pm

    Rocky, MM must be paying only Peanuts, thats why you got yourself a monkey.

    Kiwi

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anonymous5:50 pm

    Looks like the more colorful, more controversial, more skeletons in your closet, the more you get rewarded UMNO style?



    HAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
  34. Aquarius5:50 pm

    To Rocky and Shamsul Yunos,

    Please answer this question and I will not harp on the disbarred thing.

    Would BN field Kasitah Gadam in any election even though he was acquitted by the courts for corruption?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Anonymous5:51 pm

    Fine,

    1. BN kick out Rohaizat because he was disbared

    2. Rohaizat quit UMNO saying its not fair to kick him out last minute

    3. Rohaizat enter PKR saying UMNO zalim

    4. Now its OK for Rohaizat to enter any election.

    Moral:
    If BN semua asal salah saja mesti salah besar/dosa besar masuk neraka

    Kalau PKR atau DAP = tak salah Nik Aziz boleh rekomen masuk surga.

    Yang bodoh pengundi yang mudah tertipu.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anonymous5:55 pm

    It is just a side show to discredit a person. So what if he was struck of the Bar Tender's Council? He is not allowed to practice as a lawyer, but it does not mean he cannot do other things.

    Fish mongers, rumour mongers, part time cameramen, rebel leaders, gangsters and many more have made it to the throne, so what's the fuss?

    Even recently, a so called Yang Berhormat who slapped a policeman, claimed to have broken his hand on the thick face is still a YB, despite the incident viewed by millions on TV.

    It's rubbish. Real rubbish and the drunken Bar-barians are upset with a de-registered lawyer?

    Hey, let's nominate an ex-Tanjong Rambutan patient for the next bi-election on a Pakatan Ruckus ticket and see how the very same happy hour drunken Bar members defend him or her, in the spirit of democracy.

    A GOOD MAN DOES NOTHING.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Anonymous5:56 pm

    It is just a side show to discredit a person. So what if he was struck of the Bar Tender's Council? He is not allowed to practice as a lawyer, but it does not mean he cannot do other things.

    Fish mongers, rumour mongers, part time cameramen, rebel leaders, gangsters and many more have made it to the throne, so what's the fuss?

    Even recently, a so called Yang Berhormat who slapped a policeman, claimed to have broken his hand on the thick face is still a YB, despite the incident viewed by millions on TV.

    It's rubbish. Real rubbish and the drunken Bar-barians are upset with a de-registered lawyer?

    Hey, let's nominate an ex-Tanjong Rambutan patient for the next bi-election on a Pakatan Ruckus ticket and see how the very same happy hour drunken Bar members defend him or her, in the spirit of democracy.

    A GOOD MAN DOES NOTHING.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Anonymous6:00 pm

    barisan nazak ( NAjib raZAK )...

    LOLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anonymous6:11 pm

    Yep! i can see where u come from Amoker. For somebody who subcribe to the writings of Timothy W. Dunkin, i can see what U think of Muslims and also what u would like OTHERS to think when they read the link on your blog about what he describe as to how the teachings of Islam originates.

    That is your way of showing how tolerant non-muslims like you of the Muslims.

    That also shows how especially DAP actually thinks of this Religion of MAJORITY Malaysians.

    So you must think your're smart as hell.

    Heck if i'm going to let this beloved country of mine to fall into the likes of you.

    ReplyDelete
  40. BAR council the spinning master, anyway UMNO is very smart. Their canditate image has been tarnish or were tarnished or was made to tarnished or self tarnished just like what Anwar Ibrahim is. SO what the differents. UMNO knows they will loose and they dont have to do a post mortem since they already knew.This is the way of politics. You scrath my back I scratch yours, you scratch my upper torse I scratch your below torse otherwise you go to hell I go heaven or I go to hell you go heaven or let go to hell together!Waste time only

    ReplyDelete
  41. Anonymous6:15 pm

    UMNO bloggers are definitely getting their knickers in a twist over this one.

    Mr VK Lingam is about to face the same disciplinary board as the BN candidate. It has been 2 years since we heard his famous "correct correct correct" words but no criminal action has been taken against him by the AGs chambers for obvious reasons.

    Now would you want VK Lingam as your MP? I think PAS just might win by a bigger majority after all.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Manukau6:17 pm

    What kind of candidate can anyone expect from UMNO ? This is only to show the kind of people UMNO can produce one that has been disbarred !

    ReplyDelete
  43. Anonymous6:28 pm

    Rocky,

    You have exposed your true nature once again!
    Heh heh




    Joe Black

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anonymous6:32 pm

    what la,

    no better candidate oledi ke?

    peeper money he also want to sapu.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Anonymous6:34 pm

    Calon-calon yang dibenarkan bertanding :

    1. Convicted for sodomy
    2. Triad leaders
    3. Racist
    4. Playboy mansion material
    5. Anti-hudud
    6. Penipu besar and spinners
    7. Cult Master and fatwa spinner
    8. Champion for Liberty and Freedom of Brothels
    9. King of Masseurs
    10. Bigamist


    No-no for Calun
    1. Disbarred from Bar Council

    Hmmm, nice!


    Non-aligned

    ReplyDelete
  46. Grokker6:37 pm

    Agree with anon@3.56

    sekurang2nya mamat manek urai tu taklah pecah amanah masa die juai ikan

    Was Muhyiddin properly briefed by Zahid Hamidi PhD?

    There's nothing to stop a defrocked lawyer from contesting of course, but it certainly leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

    Shouldn't Umno do the honourable thing and withdraw?

    No? I didn't think so. So good luck Pas.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Anonymous6:42 pm

    Peraih ikan PAS Manek Urai 1000 kali lebih jujur dan mulia dari Peguam Umno Matang Pasiag.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Engineer_Penang6:49 pm

    "He is therefore legally disqualified from practising as an advocate and solicitor.

    The finding of misconduct is personal to Rohaizat Othman, as the Disciplinary Board would not hold a lawyer liable for the actions of his/her law partner(s)" - George Varughese, Secretary of Malaysian Bar

    Rocky,

    I hope you can help your buddy Shamsul's Angry guy to understand the above statement.

    Rohaizat is guilty of misconduct amounting to RM140millions.

    So guys, let us start sending sms:

    "Calon BN di P. Pasir penyeleweng wang amanah. Seleweng RM140K dari Kop. Pekebun Getah. Langgar undang-undang bawah Seksyen 103D. Tolak calon BN yang tidak beramanah - Lawyer Haris Ibrahim".

    ReplyDelete
  49. Anonymous6:51 pm

    shamsul ni sama macam reporter yang kena soal kat kes karpal.

    kena strike out pun tak faham maksudnya.

    kalau nak sokong umno pun biar betul fakta.

    ReplyDelete
  50. "The finding of misconduct is personal to Rohaizat Othman, as the Disciplinary Board would not hold a lawyer liable for the actions of his/her law partner(s)."

    ouch. lol.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Anonymous8:30 pm

    Well well well ...

    the pkr machinery is out on full steam ahead with bar council getting into the act

    Is this, I repeat, is THIS a sign of desperation brought on by an epidemic of fears and insecurity??

    hhmmm we'll see the outcome at permatang pasir

    May the fasting month of Ramadhan bring with it blessings from Allah to open the rakyat's eyes ears and thinking

    ReplyDelete
  52. Anonymous8:37 pm

    Ya ya ya ...

    and they are still supporting an ex-convict charged for power abuse, corruption and sodomy

    the one who promotes the lompat katak, street demo culture

    suddenly so self-righteous one meh

    ReplyDelete
  53. PAS SURE WIN9:00 pm

    Rocky, who is this disbarred "lawyer" ?

    I couldn't believe UMNO could field such a candidate. Really waste time only lor.

    Pull out la from the race and let PAS win by default. Jangan buang air muka la.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Anonymous9:04 pm

    HEHEHE
    u r obiously Najis ass licker.Under world Lords u say ha.Better that than fucking foreign innocent women and c4 her, wag public tax money in the name of contract amounting millions, use all the goverment staff as the running dog,Make judiciary smeel like the leaders smell that is bau tai.Why dont u see over the PKFZ scandal and That Sarawak Tiong issue? Cammon , dont think all malaysian have shit as u are.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Anonymous9:11 pm

    Bro,
    They said his partner cheated. Can that partner please come forward to clarify? If dont, MACC come and catch yewwwww!

    Hahaha

    ReplyDelete
  56. Anonymous9:23 pm

    Kenapa BN meletakkan calon yang di dapati bersalah dan tidak jujur dalam kerjaya nya. Nampaknya BN menempah kekalahan lagi. Kalau saya pengundi, saya tidak akan keluar mengundi walaupun saya penyokong BN.

    Jay

    ReplyDelete
  57. lawak la BN nie kan...
    buat malu jer

    dah tak der calon yg bersih ker?

    dilucutankan ahli sebab pecah amanah tuh...

    MARI SELAMAT KAN BN..SELAMAT KAN UMNO

    wow!!

    ReplyDelete
  58. Ku Yem9:31 pm

    rocky,

    you want to know the inside story about anwar -- check out this blog "blogger patriot". former Keadilan guy -- http://medan-info-kita.blogspot.com. and also http://ruangbicarafaisal.blogspot.com.

    interesting...

    ReplyDelete
  59. Anonymous9:43 pm

    Rocky,

    I never knew a bright editor like you has such an uninformed and desperately stupid writer in your stable.

    Pathetic lah malay Mail. Well, this is what you get for spinning and spinning and spinning all your life.

    Cheers, friend

    ReplyDelete
  60. Anonymous10:02 pm

    Salam Saudara-saudari ku,

    Tindakan puak DAP sejak kebelakangan ini amat kurang menyenang kan hati kita semua.

    Tindakan puak DAP , sekutu dan kuncu-kuncunya yang menghasut, menyemarak kan kebencian mereka terhadap agama, bangsa , raja melayu serta kaum bumiputra, tidak lain dengan tujuan untuk memenangi minda, pengaruh dan juga demi survival bangsa mereka.

    Ya, tujuan sebenar mereka hanya lah ingin menjaga dan melindungi kepentingan ekonomi mereka dan bagi mereka, golongan bumiputra di Negara ini hanya layak menjadi coolie, pekerja makan gaji dan hanya boleh menerima arahan.

    Seperti yang kita ketahui, Negara republik Singapura telah pun mempersiapkan bala tentera mereka pada tahap yang amat tinggi.

    Kecanggihan dan Peralatan ketenteraan yang mereka miliki mampu menghadapi tiga medan pertempuran yang berbeza pada masa yang sama.

    Sesuatu peperangan (tanpa menggunakan senjata nuclear) yang tercetus hanya memerlukan satu isu yang kecil dan juga salah faham.

    Dan apabila tentera republik Singapura datang menyerang, mereka tidak akan menakluk seluruh tanah melayu ini tetapi tujuan sebenar mereka hanya ingin mengambil negeri Johor sebagai zon penampan dan menjadikan sebahagian wilayah jajahan mereka.

    Saudara-saudari ku, Allah kurniakan akal yang sihat dan sudah tentulah kita tidak akan membenarkan sebarang penyalahgunaan kuasa di dalam pembelian alat kelengkapan ketenteraan Negara kita.

    Tetapi pihak pembangkang sehingga hari ini, masih lagi tidak mempunyai bukti yang kukuh berhubung isu pembelian alat kelengkapan tentera kita?

    Maka persoalan lain pula yang timbul, mengapa pula pihak pembangkang begitu berapi-api menimbulkan isu ini, adakah mereka ingin melihat Negara kita berada didalam keadaan lemah dan membiarkan sahaja tentera republik singapura datang menyerang Negara ini tanpa tentangan yang sengit?

    Dan mengapa pula pembangkang dan rakyat singapura sendiri tidak mempersoalkan pembelian alat ketenteraan mereka yang 2 hingga 3kali ganda jauh lebih tinggi dari perbelanjaan pertahanan Negara ini?

    Jika sekadar mempertahan kan diri mengapa perlu berbelanja begitu tinggi?

    Adakah kita sudah lupa apabila tentera Jepun menjajah Negara ini, mereka terlebih dahulu telah menempatkan pengintip mereka untuk memberi maklumat dan mengkaji kelemahan pertahanan Negara ini?

    Dan sekarang , jika tentera Singapura datang menyerang dan menjajah, golongan mana dan siapakah pula yang akan menjadi pengkhianat , talibarut dan membantu memberi maklumat Negara `red dot’ ini?

    Golongan pengkhianat mana pula yang bersedia untuk menjual Negara ini kepada pembida yang tertinggi?

    Golongan pengkhianat mana pula yang terlebih dahulu akan melarikan diri dari Negara ini ?

    Dan jika perang meletus, bermakna kita terpaksa berhadapan musuh di dua medan iaitu pengkhianat di dalam Negara dan juga bala tentera republik singapura yang menyerang , pada masa yang sama.

    Semua nya telah terbentang luas dan ianya berada di depan kita semua.

    sudah terang lagi nak bersuluh?

    Jihad tidak mengenal tempat, sama ada di depan keyboard computer, kerja seharian ataupun sebagai anggota keselamatan, kerana niat dan tujuan kita tetap sama iaitu mempertahan kan agama, bangsa dan negara.

    Bukalah mata dan hati wahai saudara , saudari ku ayuh mari kita bersatu dan berjihad menentang golongan kafir , munafik dan mungkar ini.


    rockybru fanclub

    ReplyDelete
  61. Anonymous10:22 pm

    syamsul yunos boleh jadi ketua pemuda UMNO. bukan setakat lawyer aje.

    hidup syamsul...
    :)

    --pemerhati jarak jauh -

    ReplyDelete
  62. Anonymous10:25 pm

    I suppose Shamsul should realised that if a complaint against him is proven and he is disbarred, even if he managed to pay off the complainant and make him withdraw the complaint he cannot expect to be reinstated.
    I'm a layman and I can understand that a lawyer is looked up to by the public and must be honest in his dealings.
    Layman

    ReplyDelete
  63. Anonymous10:40 pm

    Blardy fcuking unethical barger.

    This blardy arsehole should just withdraw & go fcuk spider.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Anonymous11:09 pm

    stupid rohaizat, he was a lawyer.. must be intelligent enough to know that opposition will dig this up.

    Ross

    ReplyDelete
  65. Anonymous11:33 pm

    Ha Ha Rocky.
    Your friend tidak paham what is DISBARRED lah..He thought disbarred means WITHDRAWN....So do you still want us to send the following comment to Haris. Personally I dare not lah, saya malu lah

    "Human Rights Lawyer Haris Ibrahim initiates smear campaign against BN candidate in Permatang Pasir by deliberately ignoring fact that complaint against Rohaizat has been withdrawn in March2008 and appeal process now underway"

    ReplyDelete
  66. Anonymous11:35 pm

    hello brader,
    apa yg u all kisah pasal mamat tu disbarred by bar council. by law he still eligible to contest as ADUN what?!! there are lots of ADUN who are kaki pompuan, kaki minum, kaki tipu, kaki rasuah, kaki judi, kaki berbulu but as long they are not convicted in court of law, then no rules said they cannot contest la.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Anonymous11:36 pm

    We all should except what is morally right and wrong,this is honesty we are talking here, if one can convicted of fraud, please for our country's sake do not defend him. Rocky, you are an example to the future generations to come. Do you want dishonest people being looked up as example. This goes beyond partisan politics, BN will be strengthen further, if it withdraws from this election for much bigger win in the next election.I am sure even Tun Mahathir has said that corruption in UMNO will be detremental for its survival. Please stop defending dishonest person as this will only reflect your character.

    Abil

    ReplyDelete
  68. Anonymous12:06 am

    Haiya ...

    Why worry one?

    the more the merrier

    the sodomite
    the accidental pornstar
    the china ambassador
    the heaven's gatekeeper
    the above-law underworld boss
    the phantom company director

    hey its a circus

    ReplyDelete
  69. Anonymous12:07 am

    shamsul = RTM reporter = Utusan Reporter

    ReplyDelete
  70. Anonymous12:22 am

    HEHEHE, antipuksman and eddy, 3 new UMNO babis, no matter how much lies and propaganda you spin, you UMNO disbarred lawyer Rohaizat is going to face the biggest defeat on 25 Aug? Who wants to vote in an adun who will cheat his constituents in the way he cheated his clients as a loyar buruk! Admit the fact that your Bershire Boar MY-URINE-YOU-SIN has shot himself in the foot by picking the wrong candidate in his boast of wind of change in Permatang pasir. MY-URINE-YOU-SIN has in fact created another minor tsunami to blow UMNO out of Permatang Pasir

    Hidup PAS! Takbir!

    Pengundi Permatang Pasir

    ReplyDelete
  71. Anonymous12:44 am

    Memang susah nak cari calon yang bersih kebelakangan ini.

    Calon paling bersih yang dapat dijadikan idola hanyalah peraih ikan, getah dan kelapa sawit. Itu pun belum berhadapan dengan ujian. Selepas diuji, tak tahulah lulus atau tidak.

    Nombor dua paling bersih dan ada sedikit pelajaran ialah di Bukit Selembu. Calon berkenaan tercalit sedikit aja dengan isu penjualan kenderaan. Apapun, ketaksuban memadam segalanya.

    Nombor tiga paling bersih ialah di Bukit Gantang. Ada calon yang tercait dengan isu pemerolehan Lexus. Namun, seperti di atas, ketaksuban membutakan banyak mata.

    Yang lain-lain macam mana? Bebas dari kesalahan jenayah seksual? Bebas daripada rasuah? Bebas dari kesalahan moral? Bebas dari mencarut? Bebas dari budaya politik jalanan? Bebas dari penyelewengan peruntukan pembangunan daerah? Bebas daripada bersekongkol dengan elemen kongsi gelap, rumah urut, pusat karaoke dsbnya?

    antihipokrit

    ReplyDelete
  72. Rocky, sad man. You made this posting relying on a source who sounds more like rambling and pulling at straws to bleach UMNO's candidate.

    Fact is Rohaizat should have declared to his UMNO bosses the truth of his position to save them from embarrassment.

    As it is it would seem like to become an UMNO candidate you got to have baggage!!

    ReplyDelete
  73. Anonymous4:26 am

    Bro Rocky...
    Kes ni kalau nak disamakan dengan kes liwat Anwar boleh gak. Orang PR kata Rohaizat memang gelapkan duit. Tapi mereka tetap kata Anwar tak liwat orang di Tivoli Villa, walaupun tiga hakim kata ada bukti kejadian liwat itu berlaku. Cuma si Al-Juburi ni dibebaskan disebabkan masalah teknikal. Tapi LIWAT tu tetap adaaaa.
    Demikian lah adanya al kisah si Aljuburi ni. Liwat memang dilakukan oleh Anwar.
    Jadi si Anwar ni lagi lah teruk.

    John Labu

    ReplyDelete
  74. Umno.. Umno.... Do a detail background checking ....any nominated candidate must be honest enough to admit any skeleton in the closet....

    ReplyDelete
  75. Rocky,

    The Bar Council has always been pro-opposition. If any of you have any doubt just ask Tun Mahathir himself.

    No wonder Tun Mahathir never trusted this 'people'. Now I understand what he meant when he told us long time ago that the Bar Council is just like the Opposition.

    Enough about the Bar Council. I would like to highlight the fact that MANY PEOPLE have yet to realize :

    The Koperasi Pekebun Getah have WITHDRAWN...yes...WITHDRAWN their accusation towards Rohaizad. Mind you, his partner was the one who stole the money NOT him. See the links below (dont be lazy).

    http://www.pisau.net/

    There is even an official letter from the KOPERASI themselves.

    I would like to ask Nik Aziz, how come he can proudly say to all that only PAS members go to heaven when PAS members create such a devastating fitnah?

    ReplyDelete
  76. Anonymous7:52 am

    Kepada Samdol Kg Nangka Busok, antipuksman dan yg lain2 CyberTrooper dan (SB) yg memantau blog ni,
    Ni jer la keje korang kan!
    tak suka bace, berambusssss!!
    toksah jadi batu api, bro n sis skalian.
    Ingat! lepas di dunia, adakah korang lepas di akhirat kelak???? (for Moslem only yeaa..)

    Cheers and hepi working to CT n SB.. daaaaaaa

    ~ I say what i like to say~

    ReplyDelete
  77. patriot jawa johor9:42 am

    rocky,
    they may call u a lot of unsavoury names these days, but i know who u really r n u r none of that. u r a good person despite whatever faults others perceived of u. well, actually just want to tell u that i checked out for the first time the blog sophie's world which u have kept in yr blog roll n was so touched by the final few postings, expecially what eddie's wife said as a farewell to him. It reminds me that this world is still a beautiful place despite all these political ugliness. Farewell eddie, and all the best to his wife. May God be with both of u. N to u rocky, thanks for keeping that blog around. Cheers.

    ReplyDelete
  78. bro rocky .. i think u should go to this site to ..

    http://www.pisau.net/

    ReplyDelete
  79. Pembangkang10:30 am

    In this matter, Bar Council is only stating the fact. The one who give the sentencing to Rohaizat is the Disciplinary Board not the Bar Council. Check this:
    http://www.asdb.org.my/boardmembers.html
    The Chairman is Tan Sri Khalid who is The Secretary of Penang Barisan Nasional for so many years but not sure if he still is this year.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Anonymous12:43 pm

    aiya !! apalah lu Muhyiddin....lain kali calonlah 'Rockybru', gerenti menang punya !!

    saya sokong sama "Rockybru" !!



    Dakis.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Anonymous12:59 pm

    Yoyoyo..!

    BAR council is fully with Indian maa... they want to conquer it. That why only stupid Malay joint it. Rest of Malay lawyers joint Muslim Lawyers council.


    Hang Tu

    ReplyDelete
  82. Anonymous12:59 pm

    Yoyoyo..!

    BAR council is fully with Indian maa... they want to conquer it. That why only stupid Malay joint it. Rest of Malay lawyers joint Muslim Lawyers council.


    Hang Tu

    ReplyDelete
  83. Anonymous1:14 pm

    An alternative view on this is found at : http://harismibrahim.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/rockyn-n-rollin-to-the-djs-delinquent-journos-spin/

    Good to enlighten ourselves with views on both sides of the coin?

    THERE IS INDEED FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.

    MALAYSIA BOLEH.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Rock,

    The official statement from the Bar Council speaks for itself.

    The appeal was also dismissed by the high court - the highest court of law in Malaysia.

    These two events spell one thing about the candidate: guilty of misappropriating client's money.

    It is as simple as that.

    No qualified persons under Legal Profession Act 1976 can touch stakeholder sum.

    Yang tertulis di atas kesemuanya FAKTA. Sekarang tepuk dada, tanya selera.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Anonymous1:53 pm

    I don’t know Rohaizat Othman. He may be a fine upstanding citizen. However, his public record of dishonesty would long ago have disqualified him from being a candidate for public office in any normal political party.

    Is Umno so short of people that we have to find a lawyer disbarred for financial dishonesty to stand? Has financial misconduct become so common among us that we no longer see it as a factor in a candidate’s suitability? The party leaders who select and screen candidates must have known of this impediment but considered financial misconduct a trivial matter.

    Honesty is a minimal condition for public office. Whatever the other virtues of the candidate, he should not be considered if he fails this test. The candidates we field for election must have a clean record because we are asking the public to place their confidence in him as their leader, and democratic government breaks down without public confidence. We are also saying this candidate represents us. I’m sad to have to say such obvious things.

    By fielding a disbarred lawyer, today’s Umno is projecting the image that it lives by a different moral code from the rest of Malaysia. One set of rules for Umno, and another for everyone else. Either that, or this is the best we can do. — razaleigh.com

    ReplyDelete
  86. Anonymous2:24 pm

    Shamsul put up an update today which says that the Co-operative is withdrawing its case against the BN candidate.

    But why lah after the hoo hah, then only BN has to make such announcement at its election campaign sites?

    The fact remains - this fellow still cannot practise and has been barred till now by the Bar Council.

    Anyone wants to deny that?

    And why this fellow did not appeal again with all such documents to Bar Council last year and get his record cleared?

    Anyone of you want to check with the Bar Council if this fellow actually sharred this letter with the Bar Council to get his name cleared?

    Bodoh punya Malaysian.
    Taking things for granted and want to be politician.

    Cannot even clean up your backyard in time, but now want to serve the rakyat?

    Pegi dah.

    The voters are smarter.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Anonymous6:23 pm

    Bro,

    What is wrong with these people? The leader of the Pakatan is an ex convict who spent six years in jail for abuse of power. He ordered the Police to arrest and torture Ummi Hafilda Ali because she wrote a letter (complete with her name, IC No and Address) that Anwar Ibrahim was involved in a sexual affair. For this crime of abuse of power to save his own backside, Anwar Ibrahim was sent to jail for six years.

    Then he was also found guilty of sodomy and sent to jail for 9 years. Altho his jail sentence was overturned TEN JUDGES still found him guilty. Only TWO judges in the final sitting of a three man Federal Court found him not guilty on a technicality. They Court said they concur that sodomy did take place.

    The leader of the Pakatan Rakyat is an ex convict who went to jail for criminal abuse of power and sodomy.

    Anwar Ibrahim is also wealthy. His war chest still runs into hundreds of millions of Ringgit. Money which he stole when he was in power. Everyone knows that.


    The Chief Minister of Penang also is an ex convict who went to jail for telling lies. In his efforts to save the "maruah" of a Malay girl, he took to telling lies which landed him in jail too. The Malay girl eventually came out and said 'please dont try to save my maruah, you got the wrong girl'.


    Lim Guan Eng got carried away by a trap that was initially set by Anwar's man Sidek Baba for Rahim Tamby Chik. When Guan Eng got carried away, the UMNO boys let him walk into the trap too.

    Now in Selangor Ronni Liu, Theresa Kok, Wong Chuan How, Ean Yong et all are embroiled in accusations of corruption and underworld connections by their own party members. The MB Tan Sri Khalid is also embroiled in corruption including using State funds to fix his own car.

    If the BN guys are dirty, do they become clean, born again when they join the Pakatan? Zaid Ibrahim is a multi millionaire who made millions as UMNO's lawyer. Is he clean now that he has joined Pakatan?


    Chua Jui Meng and his brothers are well know sharks in Johor. Does he become clean too just because he has joined Pakatan?

    Remember this : the Pakatan is led by an ex convict who went to jail for six years on a charge of abusing his power to bully and torture a young woman. The Pakatan is led by an ex convict, a criminal.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Anonymous7:13 pm

    anti dpp

    http://theunspinners.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  89. Anonymous7:14 pm

    After 50 over years of 'honest and caring' rule, UMNO should be able to do better and smarter when 'not telling the truth'.

    See the mess they have created for Rohaizat - view it in full at http://shar101.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/the-umnorohaizat-fumblings/

    Always overconfident, no wonder too many slip ups.

    Ramai orang ketawa and this is easy fodder for Pakatan.

    And we have another UMNO fellow in Kedah who is ADUN but never attend state assembly sittings.

    Just because he is in the opposition and no more frogs that could jump over and make him an exco-member?

    See what happens when the likes of Parpukari and you focus on 'Liberating Selangor' and this guy in Kedah play's out UMNO.

    And situation in Terengganu is no better, but no one bothers/blogs?

    What drama are we experiencing.

    And meanwhile, the KLCI is diving.
    No one bothers? No need investor confidence?

    Malay Mail cares?

    ANOTHER MALAYSIAN

    ReplyDelete
  90. Anonymous10:02 pm

    what now Mr. Rocky?

    your reporter spins something, Bar council came up with something else. Should i waste my money on Malay Mail now? Clearly your reporter are not doing enough research.

    anon11.55

    ReplyDelete
  91. rockybrew,

    maybe you cn suggest to bn mp to table something like act or law when the robbers give back their loot the case is closed. then the court will pronounce they are not guilty. how bout that huh?

    ReplyDelete
  92. Anonymous10:17 pm

    Kalau nik aziz jadi calon BN sekalipun dia akan di kritik oleh PR. Itu kan kerja mereka. Malah bukan sedikit DAP pernah mengkritik Pas sebelum DAP dan Pas masuk PR!!! Hmm, politik, politik.

    Fence sitter

    ReplyDelete
  93. Anonymous10:28 pm

    Dear Hangtu (anon 12.59),

    I would suggest you read up the Legal profession Act before making a stupid comment that bar councul controlled by Indians and that's why they went for Rohaizat.

    The Bar Council is set up by Federal Legislation and EVERY lawyer must obtain a practisingcert from it. It is not by membership.

    It has legislated powers to disbar a lawyer from practising for "offences" against clients, etc. There have been many Indian lawyers who were disvarred too.

    So keep your mouth shut and be thought of by others as a fool instead of opening your mouth and confirming it to the world.

    Neutral lawyer.

    ReplyDelete
  94. People_supporter10:43 pm

    Guilty or not, or whatever it is, BN shouldn't be fielding candidate which would create doubt to the voters. look at what have happened, BN seem to be spending more time on defensive mode, answering allegations from left, right and center whereas they should be concentrating on imparting the BN's aspiration to the people. Anyhow, I pity Rohaizat, what an unlucky chap.

    ReplyDelete
  95. Anonymous11:03 pm

    heh heh

    and they WANT a convicted sodomite, power abuser and corrupted fella to be 916 PRIME MINISTER

    double standards of the highest degree

    heh heh

    ReplyDelete
  96. Anonymous11:07 pm

    Not only nik aziz would be bashed by the merchants of gloom (PR's outspoken arsehole ) if he happened to be the BN candidate; by same token even if TBH was in that place, he would also be ridicule with the same kind of derogatory remarks. Kah, kah!!

    apolitikal

    ReplyDelete
  97. Anonymous11:13 pm

    paloi a/d mulau,

    maybe you cn suggest to PR mp to table something like act or law when the PR corruptors give back their loot then their case don't have to be handled by macc. then the PR supporters will pronounce they are not guilty. how bout that huh?

    hek, hek.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Anonymous12:05 am

    After reading some of the comments here, I'm convinced that short circuit in human brain exist! seriously! example in one of the comments:
    Lim Guan Eng convicted before? of what? defending a raped girl?

    In this BN's case, it is somekind of PECAH AMANAH! paham tak?
    respect human rights!
    humanrights.com

    ReplyDelete
  99. Rocky,

    Aku rasa ini semua macam keling call the kettle black, macam la BAR Council tu elok sangat. Dia tu sepatutnya neutral tapi dia orang ni selalu bias kepada pendapat anti-kerajaan.

    Masa mangkuk-mangkuk kat selangor ni buat hal, macam surat pekeliling MB Mangkuk Ayun Selangor tu dia prang diam plak !!!!! Dia tak nak kata surat tu bolih buat sebab dia orang tahu itu tak bolih buat. Tapi diam ajer..

    Bodoh punya lawyer2....

    ReplyDelete
  100. Anonymous12:13 am

    Dear all,
    Why does MACC doesn't go investigate the Port Klang case??? So obvious newspaper come out Tiong give MCA Rm 10,000,0000 Ringgit. Is MACC blind? or running dog of PM Najib??? Also The STAR newspaper owned by MCA also keep mum on this topic?? Why is THE STAR keep mum and only report sex scandal only but not this PKZ issue?? Where is Datuk Wong Choon Wai on this topic? So far I see he wrote about masturbation topic only by some Professor. Is this THE STAR method of shifting people attention from MCA corruption scandal??? Only interest sex cases only??? Also lastly, why the f**ck MACC still not yet act on this MCA PKZ case??? Is MACC a dog of BN government?

    from,
    Concern Malaysian

    ReplyDelete
  101. what crap is the DPM talking?? trivial issues, paid back. really if he was not guilty as you said, why pay back? a con is a con regardless if you paid back or not.agree with one comment say if the thief pay back RM161k, no need to charge la. This 1Malaysia ma!!!

    Ku Li is correct, UMNO is out of good people.

    UMNO has become so blatant. They do not hide their wealth like Khir 'Disney' Toyo or Datuk Z nor have any guilt in spending rakyat money on themselves. UMNO just thinks all of us are stupid and we should be lucky they are standing for elections thus we must just vote whoever they pick. Haprak punya UMNO, even disregard the High Court ruling.

    ReplyDelete
  102. what crap is the DPM talking?? trivial issues, paid back. really if he was not guilty as you said, why pay back? a con is a con regardless if you paid back or not.agree with one comment say if the thief pay back RM161k, no need to charge la. This 1Malaysia ma!!!

    Ku Li is correct, UMNO is out of good people.

    UMNO has become so blatant. They do not hide their wealth like Khir 'Disney' Toyo or Datuk Z nor have any guilt in spending rakyat money on themselves. UMNO just thinks all of us are stupid and we should be lucky they are standing for elections thus we must just vote whoever they pick. Haprak punya UMNO, even disregard the High Court ruling.

    ReplyDelete
  103. According to BN, its his business with Bar Council, what is important is EC has cleared him to contest.

    Rocky, then a person who was convicted of being a serial rapist abroad also qualify to be chosen by Umno. After all it is between him and the laws of the foreign country. No moral considerations?
    The fact that he has violent tendencies does not matter....hahaha.

    So now I understand - so that's how we end up with these crooks in our government today.

    By the way Muhiyuddin, I think the voters of PP will politely tell you what is IMPORTANT to them. Just wait.

    Meanwhile Rocky, I read you everyday for entertainment - the Sunday matinee kind!

    ReplyDelete
  104. Anonymous12:50 am

    mangkuk r BN.kan tun dah ckp calon@politician bukan sahaja kena bersih,tapi nampak bersih.la ni ape cerita?

    m fadhil yahya

    ReplyDelete
  105. Rocky,
    another blogger is being sued by a politician and this time with Irony

    http://mstar.com.my/berita/cerita.asp?file=/2009/8/19/mstar_berita/20090819155138&sec=mstar_berita

    Nasa Sues Kickdefella for RM 10 Million

    ReplyDelete
  106. ManHon2:12 am

    The undisputed facts are these:

    1) a complaint was lodged against Rohaizat's firm well before Mar 2008
    2) due process would have given him the chance to response
    3) the Disciplinary Board found him guilty on 7 Mar 2008
    4) he returns the money and settle AFTER he was struck off as lawyer
    5) His appeal to the High Court was rejected (you cant right a wrong simply by returning the money)
    6) he is no longer a lawyer because of his actions and inactions

    ALL these took place WELL before he became a candidate. So where is the conspiracy?

    It is UMNO's screening process that is left wanting. I am disappointed with UMNO's moral and ethical standards.

    Is he really "the best" UMNO can offer to the electorate? Sad!!

    When in the company of crooks, the lesser crook is seen as saint!

    ReplyDelete
  107. Bro, another detailed clarification from UMNO Legal Advisor Hafarizam's blog which makes sense above the maddening Pakatan Rakus crowd noise, excerpt from his posting :

    "Tindakan tatatertib yang diambil terhadap beliau(Rohaizat) adalah atas kapasiti bersesama dan berasingan [“joint and several liability”] di dalam undang-undang lazim perkongsian selaras dengan Akta Perkongsian 1961. Malahan, rakan-rakan kongsi di dalam firma guaman akan terdedah kepada liabiliti yang tidak terhad termasuklah perilaku jenayah, kecuaian dan pengabaian rakan-rakan kongsi di dalam firma guaman. Ini bukanlah suatu pembahagian liabiliti yang adil tetapi itulah bagaimana firma guaman diwujudkan di Malaysia tatkala ini.

    Justeru itu, adalah tidak tepat jika dikatakan bahawa Saudara Rohaizat bin Othman diadukan atas kapasiti perseorangan beliau sebagai seorang pengamal undang-undang walhal beliau adalah rakan kongsi di firma tersebut dan liabiliti beliau adalah terpaut kepada firma guaman beliau juga. Adalah diakui setakatmana bahawa tindakan yang diambil terhadap beliau adalah dibawah Seksyen 103D Akta Profesyen Undang-Undang 1976 tetapi itu samalah seperti tindakan diambil terhadap pengarah Syarikat yang diperbadankan."

    I smell something very-very fishy with the Bar Council Press Statement and its perfect timing and not telling the public everything that we should know. I wonder if the Bar Committee is apolitical or otherwise. I hope the Bar Council can be super efficient in clarifying Hafarizam's statement about their "inaccuracy" in their press statement.

    The whole of Hafarizam's post is here: http://puu-umno.blogspot.com/

    TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2009
    KENYATAAN RASMI PEJABAT PENASIHAT UNDANG-UNDANG UMNO MALAYSIA

    ReplyDelete
  108. Anonymous4:43 am

    what now Mr. Rocky?

    your reporter spins something, Bar council came up with something else. Should i waste my money on Malay Mail now? Clearly your reporter are not doing enough research.

    anon11.55

    The reporter probably has to follow his instruction how to write the report. And that's what you get.

    Lucifer

    ReplyDelete
  109. Anonymous6:20 am

    Honestly, I had all kinds of horrors with the Lawyers.

    Bayangkan, nak jual kedai, just to get clearance from authorities one hinted to me I had to cough out "duit bola" in the tune of RM20K! Macam kita orang nih bodoh sangat?

    Cheeky fellows!

    High time these Bar Council look themselves in the mirror and check the activities of their members!

    PERWIRA

    ReplyDelete
  110. Anonymous8:20 am

    Rocky

    This time I agree with some of the readers...WHY BN DON'T DO THEIR HOMEWORK? To avoid confusion or -ve perspective they should put a caliber candidate ( clean, good track records and so on) why must put this guy Rohaizat even if he is already clear from any misconducts?

    Maybe..

    1) BN knows they will not win so put Rohaizat and they will have a good reasons if BN lost.

    2) Rohaizat is a scapegoat. (difficult to lower the majority of 5k)

    3) Strategic reasons

    4) Lobbying from some groups in UMNO and finally they make a wrong decision to put Rohaizat.

    That is my theory...

    Man

    ReplyDelete
  111. Anonymous8:39 am

    Why is the Bar Council very pro active. If the complainant had withdrawn its complaint, why and what is the basis of its action. As a layman, this shows how biased the Bar Council or maybe a.k.a Hindraf Lackey.

    Dagger

    ReplyDelete
  112. Anonymous8:52 am

    Aiyaa everybody, don't fight laaah..

    Go to

    http://workfromhome1337.blogspot.com

    if you need extra money..


    - zizoun pitchoun

    ReplyDelete
  113. Anonymous9:40 am

    For BN candidates, the more dirt you have, the more shit you have, the better the candidate. That's the only way to qualify for the BN den of thieves.

    Godfather

    ReplyDelete
  114. Bro,

    Let us see who's gonna PUBLISH it for the PUBLIC interest especially to BN proctor aka TOTOK

    To En Samdol Kpg Nangka & BN LickeR,
    URL yg anda kasi semua itu BIASED dan Tidak Berinfomasi.

    WHY? because BAR Council did not even mentioned Si Aizat's partner. It's all got to with Rohaizat Si PENGELAP DUIT KOPERASI.

    MORAL OF THE STORY
    ==================
    Even the koperasi had withdrawn the allegation, Si Aizat had already TAKEN/CURI/CILOK/SONGLAP/dll the money in the first place.

    Meaning that, HIS NOT AMANAH!! Period!!

    SEE BELOW & KEEP ON EYE of it!!

    Excerpt from URL:
    http://perakexpress.com/www/2009/08/20/sidang-akhbar-rakan-kongsi-rohaizat/


    Seperti yang diminta oleh Sdr. Yusri, rakan kongsi Rohaizat Othman, satu sidang akhbar akan diadakan seperti berikut.

    Tempat: Yayasan Aman , Penanti
    Tarikh : 20 Aug 2009 / Thursday
    Masa : 10.00am

    To rocky,
    Make sure your Sham[e]S[o]ul boy of Malay Mail do it right this time..

    JGN MALU KAN MELAYU asik nak MENIPUUU jer..

    KESIAN MELAYU..

    ReplyDelete
  115. Bro,

    JUST IN, Enjoy

    http://perisik-rakyat.com/2009/08/rohaizat-pengkhianat-yusri.html

    Yusri Isahak, bekas rakan kongsi calon Barisan Nasional (BN) bagi pilihanraya kecil DUN Permatang Pasir, hari ini tampil untuk memberi penjelasan kepada seluruh rakyat tentang kedudukan sebenar Rohaizat dan bagaimana calon BN itu ditarik lesen perkhidmatan peguamnnya.... bla..bla..bla

    Refer URL for update's

    ReplyDelete
  116. Rocky! Hahahahaha! didn't have the balls to publish my comments did you! Must have hit a sore spot! It was polite and non-abusive...

    So much for journalistic principles.
    Susah cari makan ya!

    ReplyDelete
  117. Anonymous6:54 pm

    Syiok tengok how these POLITICIANS squirm and hegeh2 JUST TO SERVE THE NATION?

    Sampai sanggup kena hina sana sini, terloncat sana sini ketahap KEMATIAN?

    See how lucky we Rakyat are. EVERY POLITICIAN WANTS TO SERVE US SAMPAI KEHUJUNG HAYAT MEREKA?

    Why dont all of us stop paying taxes for just 5years, lets see how this people dengan seikhlasnya SERVE us?

    PERWIRA

    ReplyDelete
  118. Bunnies10:26 am

    Shameless! Plain simple shameless! Some people just have no shame!

    Kena struck off and yet can come up with so many stories. I am amaze at such integrity!!

    What is even more shameless is our DPM and his sekampung of BN illiterate buggers can defend and make so many statements pertaining to this matter. I dont know if I should cry or laugh at such low morale and integrity from people who are leading us! Sigh...

    Ahbutthan, cannot blame la.. PM also very scandalous ma.. so obviously, not to be left behind, his kakitangan must also be equally scandalous if not more right? Shameless!!

    ReplyDelete
  119. Anonymous4:10 am

    Rocky,

    This is the first time Pas and Umno seem to have mutual understanding in the sense that both seem to agree to put candidates are not free from any wrong doing and hence lay themselves open to criticism. The question is why?

    Yes, regardless of who might come out victorious in the contest, neither one of them would be given any special post by Dapiss who strictly controls the corridor of power according to their whim and fancy!

    Fence Sitter

    ReplyDelete
  120. Anonymous3:16 pm

    That seems to be common in Indian lawyers. After 10+ years tenancy, my Indian lawyer landlady refused to return my deposit without even bothering to justify her action, and used her lawyer status to intimidate me from taking legal steps. Of course the money was less..

    ReplyDelete