Updated, Fri 5pm: Anwar came up with two back-to-back postings to explain his position regarding the article by the New York Post about his apology. In Penjelasan DSAI berhubung fitnah Utusan, he posted a Malaysiakini video of him accusing Khairy Jamaluddin as the hound dog of Umno. In the second posting an hour later, he republished the New York Post's article Flirting with Zealotry in Malaysia and wrote a one-para comment:
Ini merupakan rencana asal dari The Washington Post yang kemudiannya digunakan Utusan Malaysia untuk menuduh kunjungan Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim ke Amerika Syarikat sebagai memujuk pihak Yahudi. Namun Utusan Malaysia gagal mengungkapkan perkara mustahak yang terkandung dalam artikel tersebut, iaitu, Dato’ Seri Anwar tuntas mengkritik bahawa Kerajaan Israel bertindak melampau
But in both postings, the question we all want answered - Did Anwar apologize for his anti-Semitic remarks? - was not addressed. Anwar should come clean on this one. He must tell us if the Washington Post's article is true, that he had "spent a lot of time offering explanations to old friends, not to mention House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman and a Jewish leader or two. He said he regretted using terms such as “Zionist aggression,” which are common coin for demagogues like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad".
If it's not true, he must deny the story. And sue the Wshington Post, too. Takkan berani dengan Utusan Malaysia saja.