Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Why the pussyfooting, Rafizi?

Wed, 18/12/13 - Tan Sri Gani Patail, the Attorney-General, more or less says it h e r e: he hasn't a foreign bank account, not in Hong Kong nor anywhere else in this world. 
"No need for (Rafizi) to trouble himself. What he needs to do now is just come and meet me and I will issue the authorisation letter to facilitate him in checking my accounts in Hong Kong, if there is one," (Gani) said when met by reporters after he delivered a talk entitled "The Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA)" here today.   
He said Hong Kong also had a similar set up like Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM) and Rafizi could carry out the search without much hassle.   
"If there is one (bank account), its must be a miracle." 

Original piece: 

Rafizi ... If  AG is found to be clean,
Shafee must apologize. Howzat?
Rafizi Ramli says he is not stupid but after his latest antics on the alleged wrongdoing of the Attorney General, I'm not taking his word for it.  
Yesterday, the PKR strategic director bragged about turning over Gani Patail, the AG, to the ICAC as if the Hong Kong graft busters come under his boss Anwar Ibrahim's personal ambit. But today, after the AG told Rafizi he may look at his accounts in HK or anywhere in the world, Rafizi is suddenly not so gung-ho.  
I suspect Rafizi has just found out that Gani may actually not have any foreign bank account, unlike some people do. It could also have something to do with the AG's promise to take legal action against those accusing him of treason, ie deliberately losing Pulau Batu Putih to Singapore at the ICJ in 2007 in exchange for money. 
Either way, it is clear that Rafizi, despite his bravado, isn't ready not to face the music if in the end there's no wrong-doing on the part of the AG.  
Read the article by fz.com (the same one in which Rafizi declares "I am not stupid" and "I don't want to be used as a pawn to clear [Gani's] name' -- Rafizi IS preparing to pass the buck to Shafee Abdullah or/and Mat Zain already!
Shafee: Me apologize to AG? Howzat again?
Rafizi also said that if after the scrutiny, there was no misconduct found, lawyer Tan Sri Shafee Abdullah will have to apologise over his comments.
Mat Zain in his statutory declaration claimed Abdul Gani had deliberately lost Malaysia's attempt to claim Batu Puteh against Singapore in the 2007 case before ICJ.
(Mat Zain) quoted Shafee's statement that money was transferred to Abdul Gani’s accounts in Hong Kong to lose the case. Shafee however has denied the statement. 
Someone ought to tell Rafizi ... 
Read also:
Media bantu Rafizi cari bank akaun Gani di Hong Kong


  1. Anonymous11:28 pm

    Tan Sri,

    "Either way, it is clear that Rafizi, despite his bravado, isn't ready not to face the music if in the end there's no wrong-doing on the part of the AG."

    Double negative, Tan Sri.

    If he "isn't ready not to face the music", then, errrr, logically he's ready to face the music.

    I suspect there is one hell of a hidden orchestra behind this whole Gani-Shafee-Zain thingy. Musically speaking.

  2. Anonymous5:58 am

    only Allah knows what is in their mind.

  3. Anonymous9:05 am

    Anonymous 11.28 rocky also outsource his blog to bangla writers with errors

  4. drMpower10:45 am


    rafizi oo rafizi. this is another kind of opposition thing. very powerful talk in toilet, when given microphone to sing, voice become chicken voice

    i tell u what refizi. just take AG offer on that, and maybe you can paint him more black. ala just use la usual modus operandi. like usual. hish like no usual saja(macam tak biasa saja)

    that what u people do always, right.

    ps- is there any provision in the law that these kind of people, to be sued to their pants and lost their parlimentary seat? i think if there is, then probably we need to take a closer look at it again. this gentleman way of dealing with crooks no longer happening. because these crooks no longer care about anything and everything

  5. You can use other people names for a free

  6. Anonymous11:39 am

    Gambar atas, ala tomei-tomei..

  7. Anonymous11:19 pm

    Not having a foreign bank account now doesn't mean there was no foreign bank account in the past; in this case, at the point the alleged funds were remitted. The banks in Hong Kong or anywhere else, upon directed to reveal whether a person maintains an an account could reply that there is currently no account in their books. If the account was closed say in 2006, details of the closed account may not be available anymore; being more than seven years. And if illegal funds of a massive amount were given, it is really an unwise man (or woman) who is honest enough to present his or her actual identification documents, knowing well that it is a personal risk to him/her.

    Good luck Rafizi, but I dont think you will find what you are looking for; even if you may be right. Malaysia can't afford another scandal in the long list of scandals...

    sri hartamas

  8. Anonymous8:02 am

    Rafizi Ramli = si Doraemon Maharaja Lawak. Apalagi lawak-lawak yang dia boleh keluarkan dari poket ajaib dia tu? Dia ni PKR's version of KJ. Iklan je lebih, filem takde. Nanti Dato' Siti tegur, baru tahu padan muka.

  9. Anonymous8:36 am

    I learned from my dear teacher that backbiting and calumny is a major sin that is punishable with hellfire. Such enormities damage people's reputations and seriously repercussions in their public and private relationships for a long time afterwards. The only expiation for such grievous misdemeanours is a thoroughgoing repentance known as tawbah nasuha.

  10. Anonymous10:11 am

    sri hartamas is right.

    By now the funds are nestling in the belly of a cayman, I reckon.

  11. Anonymous5:41 pm

    Saja bapok no 2 nak aleh perhatian terhadap kes bapok no 1. Biasa la bapok no 1 tiada kerja lain hobby buat fitnah seperti minah mongol tu. Fitnah datin pg mlm buta kat ladang kelapa sawit...:-D:-D:-D suruh pulak peguamnya ketika itu zul nor menipu...ada ramai jenis manusia semakin nak akhir zaman nih. Termasok bapok no 2. :-D:-D:-D